Yesterday I wrote a series of posts that included Twitter shutting
down a white supremacist accused of spouting hate and inciting
others to follow his lead.
Run Cheater Run
One of the groups of Traffic Exchange owners has what they
call a cheat room. IF they catch you cheating the system, you are
history. One way or the other, they find a way to prove your
offense then a mass action is taken to ban you.
Both actions, deliberately cheating and inciting hate are a
criminal offense in our joint countries. Yet up comes
another front to make us question just who it is we
are dealing with on the net.
Traffic Owners Clean House
PayPal shut down or limited several TE Industry businesses.
Whether the action per incident was correct, remains to be
proven. The onus is on the owners.
Meantime, the smart owners are cleaning house business wise.
Their intent is to go back to basics and present Traffic
Exchanges in an acceptable light as the advertising platforms
as they were originally designed.
The Question
Does an owner, who removes the ability to earn cash from their
sites have the right to delete any earned cash from his members
that occurred BEFORE this new Terms of Agreement change?
The act of ‘hiding’ earned cash until a processor can be found in
order to pay earned income is one thing. However. blatantly
deleting earned commissions under the payout level is the
question here. Does an owner have the right to take this step
without offering their members a way to invest it back into
the Traffic Exchange?
© 2016, Fran Klasinski. All rights reserved. on republishing any parts of this post, you must supply a link to the original post
I like this post, because of the cheater cheater black soul hater. That sounds just like a person with hate in their heart. And goodness knows we have enough hate going around these days.
Agree Susan. And the news is full of hate-sparked people out there doing damage to
innocents in the name of race, color and religion.
in the Run Cheater Run section:
If you are caught stealing at one store and the owner tells 15 other store owners and you get caught there and banned at all.
How is that a criminal offense on the store owners end?
no Idea I am not a lawyer to decide whether the owner should report the thief or not.
I would think logic suggests it is the thief that is creating the criminal offense?
There was no intent, imagined or otherwise to suggest the owners were criminal in
either of the two top incidents discussed. However, since by your post, there could
be some mistaken interpretation, I clarified both incidents referred to.
I appreciate your feedback.
I appears that some owners as well as members do not understand the whole idea of a commission is to put it back into the TE where the commission was earned. I belong to several TE’s that I put the commission back in the form of an upgrade, page views and/or impressions. The owner is not out anything besides he/or she has solid customer.
Good point Bob! owners have bills to pay every month. If you are earning a commission from their subscribers,
then you both benefit by reinvesting those commissions. Who knows, you might just double your future commissions?